Thursday, May 13, 2010

Update: Study Guide to help you memorize all of the Cognitive biases!

Cognitive Biases - A Visual Study Guide

You Can Download The PDF Here.

Hello Everyone,

A big thank you for all the interest in this study guide. It was originally created as a fun introduction that took the Cognitive Bias wiki and tried to make it easier to memorize.

However, the authors of the wiki article have expressed some concern over the accuracy of certain entries. The document was taken down until that could be corrected.

But, people started asking that I release a new version with a warning. In response, a new "Beta version" of the document has been uploaded with a very strong warning label up front and improved citations. I made it really clear that all the text is based on an evolving wiki page and that some of the cognitive biases in there might be incorrect wiki entries. My hope is that this will continue to get people interested in pitching in to help fix the Cognitive Bias wiki pages. :) When the wiki is in a good place, I will take the document out of Beta, and will remove the warning label.

If you are a cognitive expert, join “Operation Fix The Cognitive Bias Wiki!” Add your suggestion to the conversation here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_cognitive_biases.

Eric

28 comments:

  1. great stuff !! the best I have ever seen on this subject. Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great material; thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't see any credit for the source of the text. You're allowed to reproduce material from Wikipedia (which is what this seems to be) but you have to credit the source. People may get the impression it's your work.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As Doodznchyx said - the original author, Martin Poulter is rather upset at the lack of accreditation....

    ReplyDelete
  6. The wikipedia links are in the text, but I put more links in there to make it more clear. And, each links to the wiki page. Really sad to hear that the authors are upset, just made this as a helpful study guide. I am open to taking it off line.

    ReplyDelete
  7. What is the copyright state of this? Obviously not the text since it's from Wikipedia, but the graphics and lay out?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I just took it offline. Let's work together to make it more accurate, and put it up when it is done. :D Again, really sad to hear this caused bad feelings.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It says here that it's enough to supply an URL link to WP as attribution, and a list of contributors from the history page would just be unnecessary clutter. The document already has a link to WP written, although it should be to the list article where appropriate.

    Not getting personal attribution is something you simply have to accept when writing for WP. I hope this important document stays up!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I hope y'all get this sorted out soon and are able to re-post. I only got to skim the document and was very impressed. I'm very much looking forward to spending some quality time with the final version. And -- I want my kids to read this, too!

    ReplyDelete
  11. (Martin Poulter here)

    Eric, thanks for taking this offline. I'm sorry if I've discouraged you. Your work to make the info visual and interesting has been a great success: it's my and the other authors' work on the text which needs improving.

    You're free to take any text from WP and repurpose it into something different: that's what the CC attribution-sharealike licence guarantees. You just have to say where the text came from and make the licence terms clear. I and the individual authors are not entitled to, and haven't asked for, individual attribution.

    I hope that the cognitive bias list and the logical fallacy list will soon get to the stage where they are worthy of your treatment, and I will work towards that. Sadly there are a *lot* of crappy/misleading psychology articles on WP, so my work has ended up being thinly spread.

    WP has its own rating system: you can usually see an article's rating when you click the "Discussion" tab. If something is a "Featured Article" or a "Featured List", then it's "finished", or as near as a wiki article can be. A "Good Article" has passed a review and doesn't have major flaws.

    I wasn't upset as such: my feelings were a strange mix of pride that some of my words were suddenly being read by tens of thousands of people, and annoyance at the misconceptions about biases that were being spread. Once again, I hope I haven't discouraged you from using your considerable talent.

    Best wishes Eric.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks Martin. :) Really glad you contacted me. I will be much more careful when posting things in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This was really fantastic. Please put it back up! It was really eye opening.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hi,

    A relation of mine is a professional in the field of psychology and is interested in the project as it is now (unfinished and all) just to see what it looks like/how it relates to her understanding of the biases.

    If you could contact me at bmehne[_at_]gmail[_dot_]com (sorry for the strange typing, but i prefer my spam folders clean), i would be much appreciative.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hello Ben,

    Due to all the interest and requests to release a "Beta version". I put a new version of the document up with a very strong warning label up front and improved citations. I made it really clear that all the text is based on an evolving wiki page and that "some of the cognitive biases in here might be incorrect wiki entries" Hopefully this will continue to get people interested in pitching in to help fix the wiki pages. :)

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hi Eric,

    Great document. But I can't download it from Scribd with the download limit restrictions. Any chance it's available elsewhere for download?

    Thanks a lot!
    Ryan

    ReplyDelete
  17. this site is excellent and the guides are excellent throughout the network sought and none had information that this site has enabled me congratulate very good information is very varied and interesting is great.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I really liked your page is very good and I get a lot of information in it is the only website and found it very complete

    ReplyDelete
  19. When it was clear that the squids were ontheir way, he called the Pretty Boys. Sheteased, and with her spare hand began to caress my breasts again.
    adult intimate sex stories
    free beastiality sex stories
    hot and wild kinky sex stories
    free incest porn pics and stories
    erotic sexual stories
    When it was clear that the squids were ontheir way, he called the Pretty Boys. Sheteased, and with her spare hand began to caress my breasts again.

    ReplyDelete
  20. She hadto fight back her gag reflex. Bill looked up without taking his mouth off of her pussy.
    incest virgin sex stories
    lesbian domination stories
    masturbation stories
    my incest stories
    free porn stories sex
    She hadto fight back her gag reflex. Bill looked up without taking his mouth off of her pussy.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Free gay escorts directory. Find Gay Escorts in London, New York, Barcelona and more. Rentboys worldwide. For more details visit A gay therapeutic sizegenetics could very well be just the thing that this doctor orders when you are looking in a way to put together relaxation on the muscles. You can go for a gay sizegenetics coming from a sizegenetics who practices a really therapy the moment you join an online business that will actually feature men and women who provide these services for customers. You can easily probably find someone into your area or close to where you live who are likely to be willing to give you a fantastic gay therapeutic sizegenetics.
    http://buysizegeneticsonline.tumblr.com/

    ReplyDelete
  22. Its likе yоu learn my thoughts!
    Үou seеm to grasр a lot about thiѕ, like you wгote thе book
    in it or something. I feel thаt you juѕt сoulԁ ԁo with some % to drive the message home a bit, but other than that, this is fantastic blog. A great read. I'll definitely be back.

    my blog post quick payday loans

    ReplyDelete
  23. Heуa i'm for the first time here. I came across this board and I in finding It truly helpful & it helped me out much. I hope to provide something back and help others like you helped me.

    Also visit my web-site - chlamydia test

    ReplyDelete
  24. I heard first hand from customers that could entail busіness
    additional costs for laωsuіtѕ. Theу will
    proνide you with a trusted shredding company both options are great, it just means theгe will be an omen of bad business luck.
    So, іf you purсhаse аll of youг idеas, уou
    have to pay them. In а conserѵative оffice sanԁals
    or οpen-toed shoеѕ will not be any real
    ԁifference between the mаrkеting plan whiсh
    arе thought-filled and rеsearch-based. Rose Μarie Βelfοrti,
    the town сlerk in Ledyard, N.

    Μу blog ... internet marketing plr

    ReplyDelete
  25. If you wіѕh for to gеt a great dеal from thіs piеce of writing then уou havе to apply suсh methoԁs tо yοur wоn blog.


    Ϻy blog - payday loans

    ReplyDelete
  26. Thanks for finally writing about > "Update: Study Guide to help you memorize all of the Cognitive biases!" < Liked it!

    Also visit my web site; Kingston
    New Jersey escort service

    ReplyDelete